Twisha Sharma Death Case Explained: Second Autopsy, Supreme Court Intervention and CBI Probe

Key Highlights

• Twisha Sharma, a model-actor from Noida, was found dead at her matrimonial home in Bhopal’s Katara Hills area on May 12, 2026. Her death was initially reported as a case of hanging, but her family has alleged dowry harassment and foul play.
• The Supreme Court has taken suo motu cognisance of the case, citing concerns over alleged institutional bias and procedural discrepancies in the investigation.
• The Madhya Pradesh High Court ordered a second autopsy, which was conducted by a four-member AIIMS Delhi medical team in Bhopal. Twisha’s body was later handed over to her family and cremated after 12 days.
• Her husband, Samarth Singh, has been arrested and sent to police custody, while the investigation is also looking into allegations involving her in-laws, including mother-in-law Giribala Singh.
• The Supreme Court has stressed the need for a fair and impartial investigation, while reports say the probe is expected to be handed over to the CBI.

The Twisha Sharma death case has become one of the most watched crime and legal stories in the country. What began as the death of a young woman at her matrimonial home in Bhopal has now turned into a high-profile investigation involving allegations of dowry harassment, questions over the first post-mortem, a second autopsy, Supreme Court intervention and a likely CBI probe.

Twisha Sharma was found dead on May 12, 2026, at her husband’s residence in the Katara Hills area of Bhopal. According to reports, the first post-mortem indicated death by hanging, but her family strongly questioned this version and alleged foul play, dowry harassment and possible destruction of evidence.

The matter gained national attention after Twisha’s family raised concerns over the investigation and demanded an impartial probe. The case has since moved through the Madhya Pradesh High Court and reached the Supreme Court, which has stepped in to monitor the seriousness of the concerns raised.

Also Read: Delhi Bus Rape Case Raises Women’s Safety Concerns, NCW Demands Police Report!

Supreme Court's Latest Updates on Twisha Sharma Case

• SC has asked the media to exercise restraint while covering sensitive investigation-related matters. In its order, the court said that statements of people who may later become potential witnesses or accused should not be recorded or broadcast in a manner that could affect the investigation.
  
• The court also advised the families of both the victim and the accused to avoid making public or media statements.
  
• The media should not prejudge the outcome of issues that are still under investigation.
• It also appealed to the public to avoid speculation and to maintain trust in the premier probe agency handling the case.
  
• Senior Advocate Siddharth Luthra, appearing for Twisha’s family, told the Supreme Court that there was a three-day delay in registering the FIR and alleged failure to preserve evidence in the case.
  
• Senior Advocate Siddharth Dave, representing the mother-in-law, submitted that her statements had been recorded twice.
  
• During the hearing, the Chief Justice said the court must be careful as the investigation is still underway.
• He added that the court would ensure a fair and impartial probe, while urging both sides to place their statements before the competent authorities instead of speaking to the media.
  

Who Was Twisha Sharma?

Twisha Sharma was a former model-turned-actor from Noida. Multiple reports have described her as a model and actor who had married lawyer Samarth Singh less than six months before her death.

Her marriage to Samarth Singh reportedly took place in December 2025. The family has alleged that after marriage, she faced mental harassment, domestic pressure and dowry-related demands. These claims are now part of the ongoing investigation and have not yet been proven in court.

Also Read: Petrol, Diesel Prices Today; Hike Fourth Time in Two Weeks; Check City-Wise Rates

What Happened on May 12?

Twisha Sharma was found dead at her matrimonial home on May 12. The case was initially treated as a hanging-related death, but her family raised serious doubts over the circumstances.

According to reports, the family alleged that there were unanswered questions around injuries, forensic examination, the handling of evidence and the overall investigation process. These concerns later became central to their demand for a second post-mortem and an independent probe.

Because the case involved death at a matrimonial home soon after marriage and allegations of dowry harassment, it attracted wider public and legal attention.

What Did the Supreme Court Say?

The Supreme Court took suo motu cognisance of the case, meaning the court took up the matter on its own. The case was registered over concerns of alleged institutional bias and procedural discrepancies in the unnatural death of a young woman at her matrimonial home.

During the hearing, the court stressed that the investigation must be fair, independent and impartial. It also asked both families to avoid making public statements that could affect the investigation or trial.

The court also clarified that it had not expressed any final opinion on the merits of the case. This is important because the investigation is still ongoing and the legal process has not concluded.

Is the CBI Taking Over the Investigation?

According to reports, the Supreme Court noted that the investigation may be handed over to the Central Bureau of Investigation, and the Solicitor General assured the court that the government was ready to facilitate a CBI probe.

A CBI probe is significant because Twisha’s family and supporters had raised concerns about the fairness of the local investigation. The demand for a central probe grew after allegations were made that the accused side could influence the case due to social and institutional standing.

At this stage, the key point is that the case is expected to move into a more closely watched investigative phase.

Who Are the Accused?

As per the reports, there are two accused, Twisha’s husband Samarth Singh and her mother-in-law Giribala Singh. Samarth Singh, a lawyer, reportedly surrendered after being unavailable for several days and was later sent to police custody.

Giribala Singh, Twisha’s mother-in-law, has also been mentioned in reports as a co-accused. The Supreme Court observed that a public narrative was being created because she is a former judge, while also underlining that the case must proceed according to law.

It is important to note that these remain allegations at this stage. The accused are entitled to legal defence, and guilt can only be decided by a court after trial.

What Are the Main Allegations?

• Dowry harassment
• Mental harassment after marriage
• Possible domestic pressure
• Questions over the circumstances of death
• Alleged procedural lapses in the investigation
• Concerns over evidence handling
• Demand for an impartial probe

Twisha’s family has alleged foul play and rejected the idea that the case should be treated as a simple suicide. However, the final cause and circumstances of death will depend on forensic findings, medical reports, witness statements and the investigation.

What Are the Latest Updates?

As of the latest updates:

1. The second autopsy has been completed by an AIIMS Delhi team.
2. Twisha Sharma’s last rites have been performed in Bhopal after a 12-day delay.
3. Her husband Samarth Singh has been taken into police custody.
4. The Supreme Court has taken suo motu cognisance and stressed the need for an impartial probe.
5. Reports say the probe is expected to be handed over to the CBI.
6. The court has asked both sides and the media to exercise restraint so the investigation is not prejudiced.

The Twisha Sharma death case remains under close legal and public scrutiny. With the Supreme Court stressing the need for a fair and impartial investigation, the second autopsy completed, and reports suggesting a likely CBI probe, the case has entered a crucial phase.

While Twisha’s family continues to seek justice, the accused side will have the opportunity to present its defence through the legal process. For now, the final answers must come from forensic evidence, witness statements and an independent investigation.

To read more such breaking news, click here.